Tag Archives: Malaysia

Why unity through enforced assimilation doesn’t work

My wife and I are currently working our way through all five seasons of Babylon 5. It’s one of the most highly acclaimed science-fiction shows ever produced for television, so not having watched it was seriously hurting my street cred as an sci-fi geek. Anyway, in one of the first season episodes, The Geometry of Shadows, the command crew of the station is presented with an odd problem.

Members of one the minor races, the Drazi, have begun fighting one another for no apparent reason, and the escalating level of violence is threatening the security of the station, so the newly promoted Commander Ivanova needs to find a solution to the problem. To do that, she needs to find out why they are fighting. As it turns out, every once in a while, the Drazis put a number of sashes in a gigantic barrel, one for each Drazi. Half of the sashes are dyed purple, the other half green, so whichever colour of sash a Drazi draws out of the barrel determines which group he belongs in. As the Drazis explain, “Where there was one Drazi people, now there are two. The two fight until there are one.”

Continue reading Why unity through enforced assimilation doesn’t work

Zaid Ibrahim a libertarian?

So I received a Malaysia Think Tank newsletter today and, surprise, surprise, it seems that the controversial Zaid Ibrahim has joined the group’s advisory board. The news was covered in The Star as well, but I didn’t notice it earlier. For those out of touch, this was the guy who resigned from his post as a minister in the Prime Minister’s department after the government used the ISA law on three prominent people earlier this year and eventually got sacked from UMNO after attending events organized by opposition parties DAP and PKR. People were expecting him to join one of the opposition parties, especially after Anwar Ibrahim commented that the PKR would be delighted to have him, but he declined without ruling it out entirely.

If Zaid Ibrahim really does lean libertarian, it’s not so surprising that he would be uncomfortable being a member of any of the main opposition parties since all of them are explicitly socialist. Malaysia doesn’t have a libertarian political party yet, but this is surely a good sign of things to come.

In other news reported in the newsletter, the Malaysia Think Tank apparently won an award from the Atlas Economic Research Foundation for its work in spreading libertarian thought in Malaysia by promoting Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged. Now, I’m not sure how exactly they promoted the novel because The Fountainhead is probably still my favorite novel and if something was being done about it in Malaysia, I’d expect to have heard something, but that’s still great, great news.

Newsflash: immigrants are good for us

Today’s copy of The Star has an article rather naughtily entitled “Night market hides a foreign secret”. It’s about a market in Sungai Buloh New Village that is operated mainly by traders of Bangladeshi origin and caters mostly to other immigrants. Even though the reporters note that the traders sell pretty much the same things that you might expect to find in a typical Malaysian market and they manage to do it at a lower price than comparable Malaysian traders, the idea that it needs to be hidden implies that this is something wrong or shameful. The article even chose to highlight only comments from those locals who happen to know about the market that put it in a bad light, complaining about how the traders there have stolen business from them, how it has become a gathering place for Bangladeshis and how it’s illegal and protected by thugs.

As often is the case, the article showed up as a discussion thread on LYN, I was pleasantly surprised to read the rational and economically literate reactions from the posters there. One posted that the government should issue them with permits and that they should be allowed to operate as they wish so long as they obeyed the country’s laws and paid their taxes. Another noted that having the local council maintain them as illegal businesses simply meant that the police and other local authorities would be able to extract regular bribes from them. Yet another posted that at least these people were willing to work hard for their money instead of posting silly rants online.

So it seems that there are moderate Malaysians who recognize that this market isn’t only harmless but actually contributes to our national economy. Which makes it doubly sad that a national newspaper like The Star would choose to skip this higher and nobler road of educating the public that immigrants are ultimately a net good for us and instead pander to populist, economically illiterate and racist anti-immigrant sentiment.

Dong Jiao Zong threatens to strike over language issue

I know I’ve defended vernacular schools in Malaysia earlier, but this latest move by Dong Jiao Zong puts me in a bit of a quandary. My libertarian instincts tell me that the schools should be free to teach whatever subjects in whatever languages they feel like and parents should be free to choose which schools their children should attend accordingly. Threatening to mount a nationwide strike over the issue however strikes me as a tad heavy-handed especially since there are already independent Chinese schools which have voluntarily switched over to teaching science and mathematics in English with good results.

The organization justifies its actions, as always, mainly based on the fundamental right of Chinese Malaysians to be educated in Chinese if they so wish but I can’t help but wonder if the real reason might not be a more pragmatic one. After all, I seriously doubt that many of the teachers currently teaching the two subjects in Chinese are able to competently switch over to teaching them in English. Even if the schools were able to recruit enough replacement teachers, that would result in a huge number of unemployed or underemployed teachers, something that Dong Jiao Zong would understandably find unacceptable.

This isn’t a frivolous point by the way. If Malaysia doesn’t have enough teachers who can teach in English competently, then it doesn’t make any sense to force everyone to teach in English, as this blog post highlighted earlier this year. Trying to retrain teachers who used to teach the subjects in either Bahasa Malaysia or Mandarin to switch to teaching in English doesn’t work very well. On the other hand, it’s easy enough to see that moving to teaching the subjects in English should be the the way forwards and unless the schools are given some pressure to move in that direction, they’ll just hope that this is just a fad that will hopefully blow over and won’t give serious thought and effort into switching over.

Fighting crime one broken window at a time

With crime in the spotlight in Malaysia (again), I thought I should highlight this article from The Economist. It’s about a series of experiments performed by Kees Keizer and his colleagues at the University of Groningen to determine the truth of an old idea: that physical disorder in the environment can lead people to commit crimes more readily. This is the same line of thinking that inspired New York’s efforts to fight more serious crimes by cracking down on minor offenses like graffiti, breaking windows and other forms of vandalism.

One such experiment took place in an alley in which people frequently parked their bicycles. To create a disorderly state, they covered the walls of the alley with graffiti while the walls were freshly painted in the orderly state. Under both conditions, a prominent “No Littering” sign was displayed in the alley. Once bicycles had been parked, the experimenters quickly moved in to put a fake advertisement flyer on the bike in such a way that it would have to be removed in order to ride the bike. When the owners came back, they had to choose either to remove the flyer and keep it on their person somehow, throw it onto the ground, or put it on another bike. The experimenters secretly observed and recorded these reactions and considered putting the flyer on another bike as an act of littering.

The final result was that when the walls were clean, only 33% of bicyclists littered, but if the walls were covered with graffiti, the figure increased to 69%. Other experiments in the same vein showed similar results. If the environment was clean and orderly, people were less likely to commit crimes or break the rules, but in a disorderly environment, people seemed to think that breaking the rules was no big deal.

I point this out because I think that it’s particularly relevant for Malaysia. This is after all the country where putting a prominent “Dilarang Buang Sampah” sign up anywhere guarantees that a pile of rubbish will show up at the spot. One of my pet peeves about Malaysians is that everyone thinks rules and laws are meant to be bent. Just look at the money-lender advertisements everywhere in places where they plainly don’t belong or traffic violations like double-parking. But as these experiments indicate, if you want to live in a safe and orderly environment, you need people to perceive the environment to be safe and orderly, and the only way to achieve that is by cracking down on all crimes, especially the small but highly visible ones, and enforcing the law to its strictest extent.

Counterproductive socialist demands by JERIT

By way of Jed Yoong’s blog, I’ve learned of the Bicycle Campaign by Jerit, short for the Malay name of the group, Jaringan Rakyat Tertindas. The campaign which starts today involves cyclists setting out from both Kedah and Johor towards Kuala Lumpur. They plan to stop at every town and city along the way to raise awareness of their demands. When they reach the capital on the 18th December, they plan to hand over the full list of their demands to the Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi.

Continue reading Counterproductive socialist demands by JERIT

Segregation and the net generation

In a recent review of a book published in The Economist, I noted something that I had suspected all along. In Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World, author Don Tapscott argues that not only are the children now growing up in a world of networked computers more intelligent and well-informed than any previous generation, they are also more tolerant of diversity and more concerned with social justice.

This is an argument that makes a lot of sense to me. After all, it doesn’t matter what skin colour you are when you’re interacting with each other on all sorts of forums, using instant messaging software, in multiplayer games, on social networking sites and even using old-fashioned e-mail. What does matter are the quality and content of your posts, messages and other forms of communications and it is by those standards that participants are judged by the communities they choose to be a part of. What could be fairer than that?

In a previous post, I addressed some concerns about racial segregation in Malaysia. I argued that the existence of vernacular schools had little impact on whether or not Malaysians of different races would cooperate and coexist peacefully in society and that the divisions between the races are the result of government policies, and not prejudices learned as children. I reiterate that stand here. The largest Malaysian forum on the internet, LYN, is full of Malaysians of all races, of all religions and many different types of schools. Yet, none of that matters on the net.

Folks are segregated on that forum, but they are segregated not by race but by the choices they make: what hobbies they take up, what shows they like, what games they play, how outgoing they choose to be and so on. It’s hard to argue there isn’t a great deal of tension between the different races in Malaysia now, but again, I say that this is due to politicians playing up the issue and instituting policies that are expressly designed to create divisions. Here’s to the hope that the net generation will prove wiser and more resistant to such divide and conquer tactics.