For once I have a decent mix of interesting science-related news announcements that are not all centered around biology.
The one medical paper in this lot is rather sobering one about the long-term risk of regularly using marijuana. The study uses insurance data and claims that those who use the substance daily for years, and especially those with cannabis use disorder, meaning that they overuse it, have a much higher risk of developing head and neck cancers. As they note, they didn’t differentiate between methods of using the substance and it could be that the increased risk comes mainly from smoking it rather than the substance itself. Still with marijuana use becoming more socially and legally acceptable, usage rates are shooting up and the long-term effects do call for greater scrutiny.
Then there’s this paper that has major implications for all of life on Earth so I supposed it counts as being biology-related. It concerns the discovery of so-called dark oxygen, referring to oxygen made by metallic nodules deep under the surface of the ocean. This presents a challenge to the conventional assumption that all oxygen on Earth is produced by living organisms through processes like photosynthesis using sunlight. The nodules however seem to be able to create oxygen using a sort of seawater electrolysis process, effectively acting like natural batteries. The discovery opens new possibilities for the ongoing search into how life began on our planet as aerobic life might well have begun deep under the ocean where there is no sunlight.
Next is another finding that is planetary in scale but it’s about Mars. By analyzing data from a seismometer carried on Nasa’s Mars Insight Lander, the team claims that they have found liquid water in reservoirs deep in the rocky crust of the planet. Though we already know that there is water frozen at the poles of Mars, this is the first time that liquid water has been found there. At around 10 km to 20km beneath the surface, the reservoir is still far too deep to be of practical use but it does help answer the question of where all of the water that was known to be Mars go.
Finally here’s a paper that hit news headlines around the world. By analyzing the composition of the central Altar Stone that is part of Stonehenge, the team claims that it must have come from Scotland at least 750 km away. As the stone is thought to have arrived at Stonehenge around 2620 to 2480 BC, this represents a considerable feat of transportation and logistics. More interesting to me is what it tells us about the importance of the site as the builders deemed it necessary to transport a stone so far and what that implies for the level of societal organization that existed even so long ago.
I was going to pass on this since it’s a three hour long film with only middling reviews. Our cinephile friend recommended it though, so I thought we should watch it in order to have something interesting to talk about. Even looking at the premise, I was apprehensive about Joaquin Phoenix taking on yet another role as a mentally ill character and the first sequence set in what looks like a dystopian city even reminded me of the Joker. Fortunately that turned out to only the first of many such sequences, each weirder and more surprising than the last. I concede that it’s enthralling just to see what happens next but there’s no point to any of it at all and so my conclusion is that this is just a plain bad film.
We’ve only watched one other film by Douglas Sirk and it was the very surprising romance All That Heaven Allows. This one, Sirk’s last film, similarly has the superficial trappings of a Hollywood soap opera but is shockingly rich with issues of racial identity and gender roles. It gets seriously dark at times and I wondered if it were only because Sirk is German that he is able to dissect American society in this way. Its main failing is that it’s a little too long and even so its ending is a bit of cop out, meandering to a stop without a satisfactory resolution. Still it’s one of the most fascinating films of the era and is so bold that it should raise eyebrows even now.
I haven’t watched an MCU film in ages but I couldn’t miss Deadpool’s official entrance into the Disney-owned Marvel. I was actually prepared to miss this if word-of-mouth was bad but reports indicated that this was exactly what I’d expected out of Ryan Reynolds. The film bored my wife and I both agree that it’s too long and can see why. It’s unashamedly a deep dive into over twenty years of superhero movie history so it’s not surprising that it offers little to non-Marvel fans. It’s a little too much even for me and it’s definitely not a good film in its own right without all that weight of history behind it, but it sure is a lot of fun who those who understand what it is doing.
This was another free game on Epic that I picked up some time ago and would never have bought on my own. It’s amusing because gamers have been talking up the potential of post-apocalyptic builder games for ages and now we have a whole bunch of them coming out. Unfortunately this one is as bland as you can get, with mechanics similar to any other city building game and very few elements that are in-theme. I spent some time getting to know how it works but the whole time I was thinking how much better Frostpunk was in every way and so dropped it pretty quick.
Nature documentaries are always spectacular and easy to watch. This one however does choose to do things a little differently. While the subject is the search for elusive snow leopard in the Tibetan highlands, it also puts two of the filmmakers, wildlife photographer Vincent Munier and writer Sylvain Tesson, in front of the camera instead of behind it. So in conjunction with the breathtaking shots of the landscape and the animals, there’s also extensive commentary by the two as they reflect on the beauty of what they see and lament how spiritually impoverished the modern world feels in comparison. It’s a nice idea but I don’t think it worked very well as their observations are simply not that original.
When I added this to my list, I had no idea that it was a remake of Akira Kurosawa’s Ikiru. I almost never watch remakes but in this instance, there is such a gulf of time and even culture between the two versions that it might be worth exploring. In the event, this is an extremely faithful adaptation of the original. It’s interesting how its Britishness makes it more humorous and entertaining to us than the Japanese original. Yet in the end there’s no real contest. Ikiru possesses layers of depth that are simply absent here, only to be replaced by sentimentality. It’s a nice effort but this is no great film.
