Category Archives: Science

Anti-vaccination nutjobs

As a skeptic, I’ve never been a fan of alternative medicine or even herbal remedies. I prefer that any medical treatments that I take be experimentally controlled, peer reviewed and statistically compared for efficacy against competing treatments. It feels however that I’m in the minority on this and even people who have a reasonably sound education in the sciences often just state that alternative medicine, while not necessarily being more effective than a placebo, is at least harmless and could provide some psychological reassurance to patients.

Frankly, I feel that this is conceding too much. Even if alternative medical treatments are physiologically harmless, admitting them into the mainstream dangerously blurs the line between truth and falseness. It means conceding authority to snake oil salesmen who claim to not only know better than trained doctors but that doctors aren’t to be trusted because they are in collusion with drug companies who poison patients. More importantly in the long run, it feeds the general perception that scientific truth is not objective and that you don’t actually need any academic qualifications in order to be a respected authority on scientific matters.

Currently the best example of how much damage the anti-intellectual crowd can do is the ridiculous argument against vaccinations. This profile of Paul Offit, a prominent scientist in the development and study of vaccines, in Wired should be required reading for anyone who isn’t convinced that the rise of alternative medicine is actively harmful. It is truly frightening how quickly the fad of parents refusing to have their children vaccinated has grown and how much damage it is already doing. Furthermore, it’s one thing if the parents are harming their own children by not getting them vaccinated, but it’s another thing when you consider that they’re endangering everyone else around them because a good vaccination program depends on everyone being vaccinated to work.

As the article explains, the fears about the risks posed by vaccines are completely groundless and even now diseases that were previously thought to have been vanquished are making a comeback because vaccination rates are dropping. The saddest part is that all this has happened before. In England and Wales in the late 19th century, an anti-smallpox vaccine movement got started causing the disease to flare up even though the vaccine had been invented in 1793. I guess this is what you get when people look to celebrities like Jenny McCarthy, Jim Carey and Oprah Winfrey for scientific advice instead of actual scientists.

Recent Interesting Science Articles (September ’09)

A little late this month because I made more posts last week than I’d originally planned for but here are three articles for September, all of them related in some way with human nature and with two of them related to video gaming. Two of the articles are from The Economist. I suppose I should try to find the time to read more widely.

The first article from The Economist covers the development of muscles in human males as a way to attract mates. Naturally, muscles in human males are useful because men do most of the fighting and hunting, tasks in which physical strength is a great asset. However, William Lassek of the University of Pittsburgh and Steven Gaulin of the University of California, Santa Barbara believe that the evolution of prominent and visible muscles in men are also driven by sexual selection, just as the tail feathers of male peacocks are. Working on the assumption that sexually selected characteristics are expensive to maintain, the researchers found that men generally consume fifty percent more calories than women do, even after adjusting for different levels of physical activity.

Continue reading Recent Interesting Science Articles (September ’09)

Recent Interesting Science Articles (August ’09)

Three articles for August and surprisingly for this blog, not a single one of them has anything to do with human nature. Two are related to biology but are more interesting in the way that they serve as examples of how science can correct a past mistake, even a long held one, as well as how popular reporting can easily misinterpret a scientific finding. The remaining one is a piece on dark energy, found via The Sycologist.

The first article deals with what is commonly taught as the most useless of human organs: the lowly appendix. As this article which appeared on Yahoo! by way of Livescience.com explains, all of us have probably been taught at some point in our lives that the appendix not only serves no purpose, being a relic of our evolutionary past, but is in fact a potentially lethal liability if it becomes inflamed.

Continue reading Recent Interesting Science Articles (August ’09)

Recent Interesting Science Articles (July ’09)

Three articles this month and all of them are related in some way to the study of human nature. The first article touches on an explanation of why depression occurs from the perspective of evolutionary psychology. The second one demonstrates that humans really are that irrational when it comes to making economic decisions. The last one is on how caffeine might hold the key to curing Alzheimer’s disease.

The first article is from The Economist and covers a theory by Randolph Nesse of the University of Michigan. Dr. Nesse thinks that depression can be thought of as being analogous to physical pain. Just as pain serves to dissuade us from doing things that cause us physical harm, so depression serves to dissuade us from doing things that cause us mental harm. By this, he means specifically the pursuit of unreachable goals. Since pursuing goals that are ultimately unreachable wastes precious time and energy, he theorizes that depression exists as a mechanism to inhibit doing so.

Continue reading Recent Interesting Science Articles (July ’09)

H1N1 conspiracy theories

Everyone put on your tin-foil hats. I’ve heard my share of healthcare-related conspiracy theories, but this one takes the cake. An Austrian journalist has filed charges against the World Health Organization (WHO) and key figures in the U.S. government for conspiracy to commit mass murder against virtually the entire population of the United States. She alleges that the current H1N1 pandemic is in fact a smoke and mirrors play. The virus, she claims, is a bio-engineered weapon that was deliberately released as a pretext to institute a mass vaccination programme in the United States. Rather than helping however, the forced vaccinations are designed to kill almost all of the population in the US, giving the surviving elite exclusive access to the vast natural resources of the country.

There’s really no need to go into the details of her story on how H1N1 was created, tested and deliberately released. The dumbest thing about the claim is the assertion that it is the natural resources of the country, rather than intellectual and creative powers of the U.S. population, from which the country’s wealth is derived. A cabal of Illuminati would be stupid indeed to kill off every else and be forced to subsist as hunter gatherers in the post-apocalyptic U.S. that would result.

There are whackos everywhere but what worries most at the moment are the anti-science, natural health nutjobs. I mean, the religious fundamentalists are pretty scary too, but they’re clearly on the fringe of society. But when you have someone like Oprah Winfrey making arguments on behalf of the anti-science crowd, they look more and more like the mainstream while the actual doctors and scientists are made out to look like bogeymen. Seriously, she’s telling millions of women that taking megadoses of hormones, and even injecting them directly into the vagina, is a valid anti-aging treatment and that thyroid problems are caused by women holding back what they have to say.

I’m not sure what can be done against this wave of anti-intellectualism and calling for more science education seems a bit trite, but this certainly reinforces my view that we shouldn’t allow science to be regarded as just another aspect of the truth, instead of being what it really is, the objective picture of reality as we currently know it.

Recent Interesting Science Articles (June ’09)

Three science articles for this month, one on how language shapes the way we think, the second one on Nokia’s plans to wirelessly recharge mobile phones and the last one, just for laughs, is a fictional piece on the neurobiology of zombies.

As the first article notes, whether and how much language affects how we think is a subject of much debate that even now is largely unsettled. This field is properly known as linguistic relativity. As someone who’s sympathetic to the views of the evolutionary psychologists, I found myself not quite agreeing with the full scope of this article’s implications, but nevertheless the results are intriguing. The most interesting part is easily the revelation of how language has affected a small Aboriginal community in Pormpuraaw, in northern Australia.

Continue reading Recent Interesting Science Articles (June ’09)

The 16-year old baby

ht_DSC_0098_090619_ssh_reduced

Even with Michael Jackson dominating all the news, the most interesting thing I’ve read all day is this one, about a girl who apparently haven’t aged since she was born sixteen years ago. The headline to the article isn’t actually true since it seems that she does age, most notably the telomeres in her cells seems to undergo changes consistent with aging, but different parts of her body seem to be aging at different rates and she certainly doesn’t seem to grow much, if at all. I certainly agree that this is a unique and extremely interesting case from a scientific perspective, and probably as close to a real-life Benjamin Button case as we’re ever likely to see.